What We Owe the Unborn
Written by Studio AM.
Your result
- Words per minute
- Score
- Pace
Words per minute mean something only with the score beside them. They describe this passage on this read. With fewer than 3 right, try the next slower pace.
Choose a pace and select Start. The passage is paced and timed, then the questions check what you understood. How pace mode works
Reading time 0:00
Today’s decision can shape distant lives. A city may build a century-long bridge, store hazardous waste, or exhaust a resource. Future people cannot vote now, yet they may inherit its benefits and dangers. One argument for obligation begins with avoidable harm. If we can meet present needs in two reasonable ways, and one leaves a hidden danger for later residents, their absence from the room does not make that danger unimportant. We do not need to know their names to know that pain, illness, and lost opportunity would matter to them.
A harder puzzle appears because present choices can affect which people will exist. A different energy policy may change jobs, migrations, relationships, and births. Later, there may be no same person who can say, “Your choice made my life worse,” because another choice would have produced a different population. Philosophers call this part of the non-identity problem.
That puzzle weakens one simple comparison, but it need not erase responsibility. We can judge institutions, risks, and living conditions without identifying a particular future victim. We can preserve options, avoid irreversible damage, and require good reasons before passing large costs forward.
Present people also have urgent claims. Money used for a distant benefit cannot serve every current need. Uncertainty grows over long periods, and demanding perfect preservation could prevent useful change. The ethical task is to consider future lives while weighing evidence, present justice, flexibility, and the scale of possible harm.
The passage is hidden while you answer. It comes back with your result.
Questions
Choose an answer. The explanation appears after you answer.
-
Question 1 of 4
What is the main idea of the passage?
The answer is B: Future people deserve moral consideration even when their identities are unknown, but obligations must be balanced with present needs and uncertainty.
The argument sustains future concern while qualifying it through identity puzzles, current justice, evidence, and change.
-
Question 2 of 4
Why does the non-identity problem complicate a claim of personal harm?
The answer is C: A different present choice might lead to different future people existing rather than the same person living differently.
The second paragraph explains that policies can alter the chain of events leading to particular births.
-
Question 3 of 4
What does “irreversible” mean?
The answer is D: not realistically able to be undone
The passage recommends preserving options rather than passing forward damage that cannot be reversed.
-
Question 4 of 4
Which present action does the passage use as an example of a century-long effect?
The answer is A: building a long-lasting bridge
The opening paragraph describes a city building a bridge expected to last a century.
Score: none answered yet.