The Silence Between Strangers

Written by Studio AM.

On a train, silence between strangers can seem like a treaty: an unwritten agreement that everyone prefers to be left alone. Starting a conversation may feel awkward if we assume the other person would rather not talk.

Psychologists Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder tested this assumption with commuters. Participants predicted that talking with a stranger would be less pleasant than keeping to themselves. Yet those assigned to converse reported a more positive journey, on average, than those assigned to remain separate. The researchers also found that people underestimated others' interest in connecting.

The mismatch suggests one reason a quiet carriage stays quiet: some passengers may be waiting for a sign of interest from someone who is waiting for the same thing. A preference can be misread when silence is treated as its only evidence.

This gives an ordinary greeting a modest value. It can offer a choice without demanding a conversation. A short answer, headphones, or a return to a book may signal that the other person wants quiet. The useful lesson is to question an automatic assumption while remaining attentive to the response.

Questions

Choose an answer. The explanation appears after you answer.

  1. Question 1 of 4

    Which statement best captures the essay's argument?

  2. Question 2 of 4

    The essay's mechanism would best explain which of these situations?

  3. Question 3 of 4

    The silence is compared to a "treaty". What does that word mean?

  4. Question 4 of 4

    What did the commuters who were assigned to talk report?

Score: none answered yet.

More passages

Practise reading